Date

12-2015

Document Type

Thesis

Degree Name

M.S.

Institution

Oregon Health & Science University

Abstract

Randomization is a key characteristic of clinical trials which makes them the gold standard for determining treatment effectiveness. Response-adaptive randomization is desirable because it allows more patients to receive the best treatment; however, compared to traditional equal randomization, response-adaptive randomization is more likely to allow imbalance in prognostic baseline covariates. We propose a simple yet flexible two-stage randomization for multi-arm trials which marries response-adaptative and covariate-balancing designs. The operating characteristics of the proposed methods were assessed via simulation for a variety of scenarios in which values of treatment success probability and patient response delay time were varied. The newly proposed methods consistently outperformed equal randomization in terms of reducing the proportion of treatment failures for subjects and compared favorably to response-adaptive only randomization while significantly improving the balance of prognostic covariates between treatment arms. The proposed design also compared favorably with a Bayesian approach to response-adaptive covariate-balanced design, providing equal or better power and covariate-balance.

Identifier

doi:10.6083/M4PR7TX9

School

School of Public Health

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.