This article discusses ethical issues during end-of-life care in hospitals. The commonly used medical-ethics framework for ethical reasoning comprising of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice is somewhat limited in guiding healthcare decisions. The continuing advancement in medical technology, current medico-legal environment, longer life-expectancies and increasing contextual awareness are some of the reasons why this ethical framework is limited. In addition to this, the high costs involved in end-of-life care make limit-setting decisions necessary. In order to be well received, these decisions need to meet the four conditions of accountability for reasonableness namely – publicity, relevancy, revision and appeal, and regulation. There are many stakeholders in decisions pertaining to end-of-life care besides the patient, with their own unique perspectives that complicate the situation. The article provides examples of ethical conflicts, the relevant stakeholders, factors that influence these unique perspectives and the potential for politicization of issues. The author touches on the subject of physician-aidin- dying and concludes with a few recommendations for healthcare organizations to effectively deal with ethical issues during end-of-life care.

Publication Date



medical ethics, healthcare, medical decisions, patients, physicians

Rights Statement

This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.





To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.